What Should the Lakers Learn From the Thunder Series Sweep?

3 min read
What Should the Lakers Learn From the Thunder Series Sweep?

What Should the Lakers Learn From the Thunder Series Sweep?

What Should the Lakers Learn From the Thunder Series Sweep?

What Should the Lakers Learn From the Thunder Series Sweep?

The Los Angeles Lakers' playoff exit at the hands of the Oklahoma City Thunder was swift and decisive—a 4-0 series sweep that left little room for debate. Without Luka Doncic in the lineup, the Lakers simply couldn't match the reigning champions' relentless pressure and seemingly endless depth. But every defeat carries a lesson. Here's what the Lakers should take away from this humbling series.

First, the bright spot: Rui Hachimura and Luke Kennard were the Lakers' only consistent perimeter threats. Hachimura was on fire, averaging four made three-pointers per game on an incredible 55.2% shooting from beyond the arc. Kennard wasn't far behind, knocking down two threes per game at 57.1%. LeBron James was the only other Laker to hit at least two threes per game while shooting over 35% from deep. If Hachimura hadn't been scorching hot throughout the series, this sweep would have been even uglier.

But the Lakers' frontcourt told a different story. Deandre Ayton's production as a starting center was wildly inconsistent. He opened the series with a solid 10-point, 12-rebound performance in Game 1, but shot just 5-of-12 from the field and didn't take a single shot outside the paint. That turned out to be his best game of the series. In Game 2, he grabbed 10 rebounds but managed only three points on 1-of-7 shooting. He rebounded offensively in Games 3 and 4, shooting a combined 8-of-12, but his rebounding vanished—he pulled down just three total defensive boards in those final two games.

Then there's the elephant in the room: LeBron James. At 41 years old, he still led the team in scoring for the series and can't be blamed for the Lakers' collapse. But the LeBron era in Los Angeles has simply run its course. Moving on from the future Hall of Famer would allow the Lakers to build what they desperately needed in this series: depth. The Thunder exposed that weakness time and again.

Here's the most telling stat: the Lakers did an excellent job containing Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, the likely two-time MVP. He averaged just 24.5 points per game in this series—his lowest scoring average in a playoff series since the 2019-20 season. And yet, the Thunder still won convincingly. They had too many weapons for the Lakers to compete with. Oklahoma City's depth and versatility were the difference-makers.

The lesson is clear: the Lakers need to learn from their vanquisher. Build a deep, complete roster that doesn't rely on a single superstar to carry the load. In today's NBA, depth wins championships—and the Thunder proved it.

Like this article?

Order custom jerseys for your team with free design

Back to All News