The question hanging over the Emirates is as dramatic as it gets: should Mikel Arteta be sacked even if Arsenal wins the Premier League title? It sounds unthinkable, yet a vocal segment of the fanbase has suggested just that, framing this season as a championship-or-bust ultimatum for their manager.

In reality, the club's hierarchy appears to view the project through a much longer lens. Reports of early contract extension talks with Arteta signal the Kroenke family's commitment, suggesting their faith isn't contingent on silverware alone. This creates a fascinating disconnect between the boardroom and a portion of the stands.

The debate has escalated to a point where some supporters claim even a historic title—ending a 22-year drought—wouldn't be enough. Criticisms often cite stylistic preferences or an over-reliance on set-pieces, arguing the means detract from the end. This mindset isn't unique to Arsenal; look at the pressure on Liverpool's Arne Slot after a title-winning campaign. It begs the question: if lifting the trophy doesn't buy a manager credit, what does?

Imagine the scene: a parade through North London, the Premier League trophy finally back at Arsenal, yet a chorus of dissent calling for the architect's dismissal. It's a scenario that challenges the very point of fandom. You don't have to adore every tactical nuance, but securing the ultimate prize in English football commands respect.

The pressure is immense. Finishing as runners-up again would invite relentless mockery. But shouldn't that energy be matched, if not surpassed, by celebration and acknowledgment if he actually wins the whole thing? For a club and a fanbase yearning for a return to the summit, perhaps it's time to remember what truly constitutes success.