How controversial VAR calls have defined two title battles

3 min read
How controversial VAR calls have defined two title battles

How controversial VAR calls have defined two title battles

England and Scotland have experienced two highly controversial VAR decisions in a matter of days which could help to decide who ends the season as champions.

How controversial VAR calls have defined two title battles

England and Scotland have experienced two highly controversial VAR decisions in a matter of days which could help to decide who ends the season as champions.

The drama of title races often hinges on moments of controversy, and this week has delivered two of the most talked-about VAR decisions in recent memory. Within days of each other, England's Premier League and Scotland's Premiership witnessed stoppage-time interventions that could shape the destiny of their respective championships.

It all started on Sunday, when West Ham thought they had snatched a late equalizer against Arsenal. The goal was ruled out after a VAR review deemed a foul by the Hammers' player on goalkeeper David Raya. The 1-0 win kept Arsenal's title hopes firmly in their own hands, while deepening West Ham's relegation fears. For neutral fans, the decision felt like another instance of the big club getting the rub of the green, with many pointing to Arsenal's set-piece dominance and perceived physicality as reasons for the backlash.

Just three days later, the script flipped north of the border. With only eight seconds of added time remaining, VAR awarded Celtic a penalty for handball against Motherwell's Sam Nicholson. Kelechi Iheanacho stepped up to score the last kick of the game, snatching a 3-2 win that kept the Hoops in the title hunt. The controversy was immediate, as the decision went against the underdog and in favor of one of Scotland's traditional giants.

Both moments share a common thread: the title-chasing club benefited from a VAR call that sparked fury among neutrals. In England, many fans simply don't want Arsenal to win, citing their style and reliance on set pieces. As Danny Murphy noted on Match of the Day, "The controversy and discontent around West Ham not being given the goal is because it's Arsenal. Just because it's Arsenal, we shouldn't get it distorted."

Across the border, the sentiment is similar but with a different twist. Scottish football has been dominated by Celtic and Rangers for decades—no team outside the Old Firm has won the title since Sir Alex Ferguson's Aberdeen in 1984-85. So when a VAR decision helps Celtic snatch victory from Motherwell, it feels like another blow to the dream of a new champion. Many neutrals are rooting for Hearts to break the duopoly, making every controversial call in favor of the green-and-white side sting a little more.

What these two decisions reveal is not just the power of VAR, but the emotional weight of context. In both cases, the technology was used to enforce the rules, but the reactions were shaped by who benefited and who lost. As the title races heat up, these moments will be replayed and debated for weeks—proving that in football, the drama is never just about the final score.

Like this article?

Order custom jerseys for your team with free design

Related Topics

Related News

Back to All News