West Ham fans have had their say on Nuno Espirito Santo's future at the London Stadium, and the message is clear: the problems run far deeper than the man in the dugout.

With the Hammers flirting with relegation, we asked supporters whether Nuno is the right man to lead them through the storm. The response was a resounding vote of confidence in the Portuguese boss—but a damning indictment of the club's ownership.

"The 'managerial' response to relegation isn't to offload another coach," said Rob. "There's been more than enough of that. The European trophy should have been a springboard to greater things, but the owners have blundered and bungled our club into the jaws of the Championship."

Mike offered a more measured perspective, noting Nuno's track record: "He had the misfortune to take over mid-season after a very poor start, but he does have a reasonable record if he starts the season at a club. Hopefully wherever we finish, he'll start as our head coach next season."

Barry pointed to the boardroom as the root cause: "Nuno has done OK but, like any manager, can only do limited things if you are not backed by the chairman. David Sullivan did not back him like he should have done in the January transfer window or with his backroom staff. West Ham will never come good until Sullivan has gone."

Stephen echoed that sentiment: "Stay up or go down. There are bigger issues at the club than another change of manager. The board need to take a long, hard look at themselves. Nuno stays please."

Colin was unequivocal: "If Nuno wants to stay and, crucially, Paco Jemez is staying with him, then it's a no-brainer. He has to stay whether we remain in the Premier League or are relegated." However, he floated an intriguing alternative: "If he decides to leave, I'd like to see us go for Bellamy. He played for us, understands us, is passionate, and I believe it would be a great fit."

Paul summed up the mood with a simple observation: "A look around at the top Premier League clubs and what they have is manager." For West Ham, the question isn't just about who's in charge—it's about who's in charge of the club itself.